How to write a discussion section

The discussion chapter is where you delve into the meaning, importance and relevance of your results. It should focus on explaining and evaluating what you found, showing how it relates to your literature review and research questions, and making an argument in support of your overall conclusion. There are many different ways to write this section, but you can focus your discussion around four key elements:

  • Interpretations: what do the results mean?
  • Implications: why do the results matter?
  • Limitations: what can’t the results tell us?
  • Recommendations: what practical actions or scientific studies should follow?

There is often overlap between the discussion and conclusion, and in some dissertations these two sections are included in a single chapter. Occasionally, the results and discussion will be combined into one chapter. If you’re unsure of the best structure for your research, look at sample dissertations in your field or consult your supervisor.

Summarize your key findings

Start this chapter by reiterating your research problem and concisely summarizing your major findings. Don’t just repeat all the data you have already reported aim for a clear statement of the overall result that directly answers your main research question. This should be no more than one paragraph.

Examples

  • The results indicate that…
  • The study demonstrates a correlation between…
  • The analysis confirms…
  • The data suggests that…

Give your interpretations

The meaning of the results might seem obvious to you, but it’s important to spell out their significance for the reader and show exactly how they answer your research questions.

The form of your interpretations will depend on the type of research, but some typical approaches to interpreting the data include:

  • Identifying correlations, patterns and relationships among the data
  • Discussing whether the results met your expectations or supported your hypotheses
  • Contextualizing your findings within previous research and theory
  • Explaining unexpected results and evaluating their significance
  • Considering possible alternative explanations and making an argument for your position

You can organize your discussion around key themes, hypotheses or research questions, following the same structure as your results section. You can also begin by highlighting the most significant or unexpected results.

Examples

  • In line with the hypothesis…
  • Contrary to the hypothesized association…
  • The results contradict the claims of Smith (2007) that…
  • The results might suggest that X. However, based on the findings of similar studies, a more plausible explanation is Y.

What is your plagiarism score?

Compare your paper with over 60 billion web pages and 30 million publications.

  • In partnership with Turnitin
  • Best plagiarism checker of 2019
  • Plagiarism report & percentage
  • Largest plagiarism database

Scribbr Plagiarism Checker

Discuss the implications

As well as giving your own interpretations, make sure to relate your results back to the scholarly work that you surveyed in the literature review. The discussion should show how your findings fit with existing knowledge, what new insights they contribute, and what consequences they have for theory or practice. Ask yourself these questions:

  • Do your results agree with previous research? If so, what do they add to it?
  • Are your findings very different from other studies? If so, why might this be?
  • Do the results confirm or challenge existing theories?
  • Are there any practical implications?

Your overall aim is to show the reader exactly what your research has contributed and why they should care.

Examples

  • These results build on existing evidence of…
  • The results do not fit with the theory that…
  • The experiment provides a new insight into the relationship between…
  • These results should be taken into account when considering how to…
  • The data contributes a clearer understanding of…
  • While previous research has focused on X, these results demonstrate that Y.

Acknowledge the limitations

Even the best research has some limitations, and acknowledging these is important to demonstrate your credibility. Limitations aren’t about listing your errors, but about providing an accurate picture of what can and cannot be concluded from your study.

Limitations might be due to your overall research design, specific methodological choices, or unanticipated obstacles that emerged during the research process. You should only mention limitations that are directly relevant to your research objectives, and evaluate how much impact they had on achieving the aims of the research.

For example, if your sample size was small or limited to a specific group of people, note that this limits its generalizability. If you encountered problems when gathering or analyzing data, describe these and explain how they influenced the results.

After noting the limitations, you can reiterate why the results are nonetheless valid for the purpose of answering your research questions.

Examples

  • The generalizability of the results is limited by…
  • The reliability of this data is impacted by…
  • Due to the lack of available data, the results cannot confirm…
  • The methodological choices were constrained by…
  • It is beyond the scope of this study to…

State your recommendations

Based on the discussion of your results, you can make recommendations for practical implementation or further research. Sometimes the recommendations are saved for the conclusion.

Suggestions for further research can lead directly from the limitations. Don’t just state that more studies should be done give concrete ideas for how future work can build on areas that your own research was unable to address.

  • Further research is needed to establish…
  • Future studies should take into account…

What to leave out of the discussion

There are a few common mistakes to avoid when writing the discussion section of your dissertation.

  • Don’t introduce new results  you should only discuss the data that you have already reported in the results chapter.
  • Don’t make inflated claims  avoid overinterpretation and speculation that isn’t supported by your data.
  • Don’t undermine your research  the discussion of limitations should aim to strengthen your credibility, not emphasize weaknesses or failures.

Checklist

Discussion

0 / 10

Well done!

You've included all the important parts of the discussion. Use the other checklists to further improve your dissertation.

See all other checklists Return to checklist
Is this article helpful?
Shona McCombes

Shona has a bachelor's and two master's degrees, so she's an expert at writing a great thesis. She has also worked as an editor and teacher, working with students at all different levels to improve their academic writing.

8 comments

Hannah J
May 3, 2019 at 3:23 PM

Hi,
Your website possibly saved my dissertation! Especially the step by step guide to writing an abstract and introduction. Thank you so much for making this available, it really is extremely useful :)

Reply

Raimo Streefkerk
Raimo Streefkerk (Scribbr-team)
May 3, 2019 at 3:59 PM

We're glad to hear that Hannah! Thanks for the compliment :-).

Reply

kara
April 25, 2019 at 5:34 PM

very structured and clear, however as it is aimed at dissertations that have collected their own research, which for mine, i was not allowed to, and therefore this is not that helpful

Reply

saira
June 4, 2018 at 10:58 PM

very informive guidline?

Reply

Huma Mir
January 29, 2018 at 4:58 AM

Very structured guidance.

Reply

Elena Batunova
April 11, 2017 at 2:22 PM

Thank you very much for the clear instruction :)

Reply

Sobia Afridi
March 31, 2017 at 6:39 PM

This article is very informative and helpful.

Reply

FREDRICK SSEMPALA
February 21, 2017 at 7:51 AM

The article is very educative.

Reply

Comment or ask a question.