Mediator vs. Moderator Variables | Differences & Examples
Including mediators and moderators in your research helps you go beyond studying a simple relationship between two variables for a fuller picture of the real world. These variables are important to consider when studying complex correlational or causal relationships between variables.
What’s the difference?
You can think of a mediator as a go-between for two variables. For example, sleep quality (an independent variable) can affect academic achievement (a dependent variable) through the mediator of alertness. In a mediation relationship, you can draw an arrow from an independent variable to a mediator and then from the mediator to the dependent variable.
In contrast, a moderator is something that acts upon the relationship between two variables and changes its direction or strength. For example, mental health status may moderate the relationship between sleep quality and academic achievement: the relationship might be stronger for people without diagnosed mental health conditions than for people with them.
In a moderation relationship, you can draw an arrow from the moderator to the relationship between an independent and dependent variable.
A mediator is a way in which an independent variable impacts a dependent variable. It’s part of the causal pathway of an effect, and it tells you how or why an effect takes place.
If something is a mediator:
- It’s caused by the independent variable.
- It influences the dependent variable
- When it’s taken into account, the statistical correlation between the independent and dependent variables is higher than when it isn’t considered.
In full mediation, a mediator fully explains the relationship between the independent and dependent variable: without the mediator in the model, there is no relationship.
In partial mediation, there is still a statistical relationship between the independent and dependent variable even when the mediator is taken out of a model: the mediator only partially explains the relationship.
A moderator influences the level, direction, or presence of a relationship between variables. It shows you for whom, when, or under what circumstances a relationship will hold.
Moderators usually help you judge the external validity of your study by identifying the limitations of when the relationship between variables holds. For example, while social media use can predict levels of loneliness, this relationship may be stronger for adolescents than for older adults. Age is a moderator here.
Moderators can be:
- Categorical variables such as ethnicity, race, religion, favorite colors, health status, or stimulus type,
- Quantitative variables such as age, weight, height, income, or visual stimulus size.
Other interesting articles
Frequently asked questions about mediators and moderators
- What’s the difference between a mediator and a moderator?
A mediator variable explains the process through which two variables are related, while a moderator variable affects the strength and direction of that relationship.
- What’s the difference between a confounder and a mediator?
- Why should you include mediators and moderators in a study?
Including mediators and moderators in your research helps you go beyond studying a simple relationship between two variables for a fuller picture of the real world. They are important to consider when studying complex correlational or causal relationships.
Mediators are part of the causal pathway of an effect, and they tell you how or why an effect takes place. Moderators usually help you judge the external validity of your study by identifying the limitations of when the relationship between variables holds.
- How can you tell if something is a mediator?
Cite this Scribbr article
If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.